By 30 September 2027, will a US court rule that the Section 338 tariffs on Canadian goods exceed the statute, in whole or in part, with the ruling not stayed?
From C-006Sealed 1 Oct 2026Resolves by 30 Sep 2027Open
Our standing estimate
One forecast: the estimate that it happens, and its complement. Our estimate, scored when it resolves.
1
The Section 338 tariffs are struck down or narrowed in a US court
12% · very unlikely · confidence not registered
F-0175 · Open
It does not happen
88%
The situation when it was sealed (1 Oct 2026). No suit against the Section 338 duty had been found when the duty brief was researched.
How it moved
Each point is a sealed register row. There is one sealed estimate for each outcome so far: a new point is added only when we register a new estimate, and the old one stays listed and scored.
The vertical line is 31 Oct 2026. Numbers match the outcomes above.
Every sealed estimate for this question: outcome number, register row, date sealed, estimate, status
No.
Row
Sealed
Estimate
Status
1
F-0175
1 Oct 2026
12%
Open
Reassessments
No reassessment yet.
Signposts
What the brief says would move the view, quoted from it.
No signpost is published for this question yet.
Why it matters, by category
Trade, tariffs and sanctions
A court is one way out of the duty without a deal; if a court strikes it, the refund goes to whoever entered the goods.
Countries it touches
The countries our register links to these forecasts, most often linked first.
The registered words that decide each forecast, quoted unchanged.
F-0175
“Happened if, by 30 Sep 2027, a US court rules that the Section 338 tariffs on Canadian goods exceed the statute, in whole or in part, and the ruling is not stayed.”
The seals: each statement’s SHA-256 fingerprint
F-0175 sealed 1 Oct 2026SHA-256 455c8925c5361f938913899ad171461e1c97e51131a5106e3eddf674ccc92aab
Each probability is our estimate, scored when it resolves. Forecasts are general research on public events and policy; they are not investment, legal or tax advice.